<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Dear Anirban,<div><br></div><div>great, glad this is resolved.</div><div><br></div><div>-Kirk</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Sep 1, 2011, at 11:18 AM, anirban mandal wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<div><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto">Dear Kirk,</span></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto"></span> </div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto">Indeed it was due to different grid. I switched the grid parameters, and now I get the same energy as obtained with Gaussian and Gamess. Use the following grid along with uks,b-lyp.</span></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto"></span> </div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto">grid;<br>radial,em,2,1,5,5,5,5,;<br>angular,lebedev,0.0,0.0;<br>lmin,29,47,53,53;<br>lmax,53,53,53,53;</span></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto"></span> </div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto">That should give the same energy as with gamess and gaussian.</span></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto"></span> </div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto">Best regards,</span></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto"></span> </div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"><span style="RIGHT: auto">Anirban.</span></div>
<div></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto"> <var id="yui-ie-cursor"></var></div>
<div style="RIGHT: auto">Anirban Mandal<br>Department of Chemistry<br>Michigan State University<br>East Lansing <br>MI48824-1322<br></div>
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><font size="2" face="Arial">
<div style="BORDER-BOTTOM: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: 0; MARGIN: 5px 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; HEIGHT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 0px; BORDER-TOP: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 0px" class="hr" contenteditable="false" readonly="true"></div><b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</span></b> Kirk Peterson <<a href="mailto:kipeters@wsu.edu">kipeters@wsu.edu</a>><br><b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</span></b> Gerald Knizia <<a href="mailto:knizia@theochem.uni-stuttgart.de">knizia@theochem.uni-stuttgart.de</a>><br><b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Cc:</span></b> anirban mandal <<a href="mailto:anirbanmandal2002@yahoo.co.in">anirbanmandal2002@yahoo.co.in</a>>; molpro-user molpro-user <<a href="mailto:molpro-user@molpro.net">molpro-user@molpro.net</a>><br><b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</span></b> Thursday, 1 September 2011 11:27 AM<br><b><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</span></b> Re: [molpro-user] Problem with simple DFT calculation: Ru atom<br></font><br>The states look identical to me, at least in terms of
occupation and orbital character. Besides since the "bad" energy is much lower, that would imply that both Gaussian and Gamess get the wrong state, which doesn't seem too likely. So it seems that maybe the changes in the radial grids is the answer. Do you know if there is a way to reproduce the new grids with 2010.1 ?<br><br>-Kirk<br><br>On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:27 AM, Gerald Knizia wrote:<br><br>> On 01.09.2011 02:21, Kirk Peterson wrote:<br>>> Dear Anirban,<br>>> <br>>> actually at least on the surface it looks like a bug to me in 2010.1. I get essentially the same value as Gaussian/Gamess with the developer's version but I get your incorrect value with the production one (2010.1). Perhaps someone involved with the DFT code can comment?<br>> <br>> There were some changes to the radial grids in the core region, and this can have significant effects on total energies. Also, could it be possible that
both versions converge to different states? There were some changes to the occupations of degenerate orbitals in the initial guess.<br>> -- <br>> Gerald Knizia<br><br><br><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>